Kommentare zu: UN Licence To Kill… http://mygreg.net/2006/04/22/un-licence-to-kill/ Verschiedene Gedanken eines polnisch-schweizerischen Ungläubigen Fri, 16 May 2008 03:37:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Karsten http://mygreg.net/2006/04/22/un-licence-to-kill/#comment-4519 Karsten Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:43:17 +0000 http://mygreg.net/2006/04/22/un-licence-to-kill/#comment-4519 Die endgültige Aktion findet sich hier: http://liberalestimme.blogsome.com/2006/04/26/online-demo-helft-darfur/ Die endgültige Aktion findet sich hier:

http://liberalestimme.blogsome.com/2006/04/26/online-demo-helft-darfur/

]]> By: Dr. Wilbur Larch http://mygreg.net/2006/04/22/un-licence-to-kill/#comment-4508 Dr. Wilbur Larch Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:13:47 +0000 http://mygreg.net/2006/04/22/un-licence-to-kill/#comment-4508 Und die USA haben ihre Position genutzt um die Briten zu blocken: Reuters AlertNet – US against sanctions on Sudan officials -diplomats “UNITED NATIONS, April 5 (Reuters) – The United States is opposing the inclusion of any Sudanese official on a potential U.N. Security Council sanctions list of individuals blocking peace in Darfur, two diplomats said on Wednesday. Britain and other nations on a council sanctions committee have recommended a list of eight names of people including some government officials who would be subject to a travel ban and an assets freeze. All 15 council nations have to approve.” http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N05335888.htm From Bolton Watch: “If you want to understand the how the Bush administration can score political points while taking a minimalist approach to the crisis in Darfur, observe how the press reacts to Ambassador John Bolton’s forthcoming disclosure of the names of four individuals slated for Security Council sanctions for their role in the atrocities there. As I write, the Security Council is discussing these sanctions, and by disclosing these names Bolton is trying to force Russia and China into going public with their objections. Says Bolton today, “These are people who are involved in atrocities and killing people and turning people into refugees.” What Bolton will likely not say is that of those four, only one is a Sudanese government official, and a mid-level official at that. He will not advertise that at American insistence the list of four was whittled down from a list of eight names generated by the UK. According to reports two weeks ago, when the US saw the list of names circulated by the UK, they objected to the inclusion of Sudanese government officials on the list.” http://boltonwatch.tpmcafe.com/node/28963 Wir versuchen, am 30. April was zu unternehmen, um die Europäer wachzurütteln: http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2006/4/20/72239/4667 und: http://liberalestimme.blogsome.com/2006/04/15/aufruf-zum-virtuellen-ostermarsch/#comment-1073 Machste mit am 30. April? Und die USA haben ihre Position genutzt um die Briten zu blocken:

Reuters AlertNet – US against sanctions on Sudan officials -diplomats
“UNITED NATIONS, April 5 (Reuters) – The United States is opposing the inclusion of any Sudanese official on a potential U.N. Security Council sanctions list of individuals blocking peace in Darfur, two diplomats said on Wednesday.

Britain and other nations on a council sanctions committee have recommended a list of eight names of people including some government officials who would be subject to a travel ban and an assets freeze. All 15 council nations have to approve.”
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N05335888.htm

From Bolton Watch:
“If you want to understand the how the Bush administration can score political points while taking a minimalist approach to the crisis in Darfur, observe how the press reacts to Ambassador John Bolton’s forthcoming disclosure of the names of four individuals slated for Security Council sanctions for their role in the atrocities there. As I write, the Security Council is discussing these sanctions, and by disclosing these names Bolton is trying to force Russia and China into going public with their objections. Says Bolton today, “These are people who are involved in atrocities and killing people and turning people into refugees.”

What Bolton will likely not say is that of those four, only one is a Sudanese government official, and a mid-level official at that. He will not advertise that at American insistence the list of four was whittled down from a list of eight names generated by the UK. According to reports two weeks ago, when the US saw the list of names circulated by the UK, they objected to the inclusion of Sudanese government officials on the list.” http://boltonwatch.tpmcafe.com/node/28963

Wir versuchen, am 30. April was zu unternehmen, um die Europäer wachzurütteln:
http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2006/4/20/72239/4667

und:
http://liberalestimme.blogsome.com/2006/04/15/aufruf-zum-virtuellen-ostermarsch/#comment-1073

Machste mit am 30. April?

]]>